— Maktabgacha ta'lim — Boshlang'ich ta'lim — Matematika va informatika — Ona tili va adabiyot — Psixologiya — Tarix — Sport — Milliy g'oya, ma'naviyat asoslari va huquq ta'limi — Xorijiy til va adabiyoti — Iqtisodiyot — Buxgalteriya hisobi va audit — Bank ishi va auditi — Sug'urta ishi — Soliqlar va soliqqa tortish — Axborot tizimi va texnologiyalari — Turizm — Xalqaro munosabatlar — Dizayn — Kadastr
✅ Sirtqi ta’lim: 12,8 mln so‘mdan. 📚 Ta’lim turi: sirtqi, kunduzgi va kechki
— Maktabgacha ta'lim — Boshlang'ich ta'lim — Matematika va informatika — Ona tili va adabiyot — Psixologiya — Tarix — Sport — Milliy g'oya, ma'naviyat asoslari va huquq ta'limi — Xorijiy til va adabiyoti — Iqtisodiyot — Buxgalteriya hisobi va audit — Bank ishi va auditi — Sug'urta ishi — Soliqlar va soliqqa tortish — Axborot tizimi va texnologiyalari — Turizm — Xalqaro munosabatlar — Dizayn — Kadastr
✅ Sirtqi ta’lim: 12,8 mln so‘mdan. 📚 Ta’lim turi: sirtqi, kunduzgi va kechki
I have no inside knowledge of a potential stock listing of the popular anti-Whatsapp messaging app, Telegram. But I know this much, judging by most people I talk to, especially crypto investors, if Telegram ever went public, people would gobble it up. I know I would. I’m waiting for it. So is Sergei Sergienko, who claims he owns $800,000 of Telegram’s pre-initial coin offering (ICO) tokens. “If Telegram does a SPAC IPO, there would be demand for this issue. It would probably outstrip the interest we saw during the ICO. Why? Because as of right now Telegram looks like a liberal application that can accept anyone - right after WhatsApp and others have turn on the censorship,” he says.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
